Article detail · 2014 · article
Femoral cartilage thickness measurements in healthy individuals learning practicing and publishing with TURK MUSCULUS
Data source split
- YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
- YÖKSİS venueJournal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation
- Catalog match (ISSN)Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
- OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
- Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Measurement of the femoral cartilage thickness by using in-vivo musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) has been previously shown to be a valid and reliable method in previous studies; however, to our best notice, normative data has not been provided before in the healthy population.The aim of our study was to provide normative data regarding femoral cartilage thicknesses of healthy individuals with collaborative use of MSUS. METHODS: This is across-sectional study run at Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Departments of 18 Secondary and Tertiary Centers in Turkey. 1544 healthy volunteers (aged between 25-40 years) were recruited within the collaboration of TURK-MUSCULUS (Turkish Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography Study Group). Subjects who had a body mass index value of less than 30 and who did not have signs and symptoms of any degenerative/inflammatory arthritis or other rheumatic diseases, history of knee trauma and previous knee surgery were enrolled. Ultrasonographic measurements were performed axially from the suprapatellar window by using linear probes while subjects' knees were in maximum flexion. Three (mid-point) measurements were taken from both knees (lateral condyle, intercondylar area, medial condyle). RESULTS: A total of 2876 knees (of 817 M, 621 F subjects) were taken into analysis after exclusion of inappropriate images. Mean cartilage thicknesses were significantly lower in females than males (all p< 0.001). Thickness values negatively correlated with age; negatively (females) and positively (males) correlated with smoking. Men who regularly exercised had thicker cartilage than who did not exercise (all p < 0.05). Increased age (in both sexes) and absence of exercise (males) were found to be risk factors for decreased cartilage thicknesses. CONCLUSION: Further data pertaining to other countries would be interesting to uncover whether ethnic differences also affect cartilage thickness. Collaborative use of MSUS seems to be promising in this regard.
Topics
Citations
OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.
44citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)
41 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).
- 2015 Ultrasonographic Assessment of Diurnal Variation in the Femoral Condylar Cartilage Thickness in Healthy Young AdultsCitations 28 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Ultrasonographic Assessment of Diurnal Variation in the Femoral Condylar Cartilage Thickness in Healthy Young AdultsCitations 28 · OpenAlex
- 2020 Effects of platelet-rich plasma on the clinical outcomes and cartilage thickness in patients with knee osteoarthritisCitations 15 · OpenAlex
- 2020 Effects of platelet-rich plasma on the clinical outcomes and cartilage thickness in patients with knee osteoarthritisCitations 15 · OpenAlex
- 2019 Effects of platelet-rich plasma on the clinical outcomes and cartilage thickness in patients with knee osteoarthritisCitations 15 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Ultrasonographic Assessment of the Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Patients with Pes PlanusCitations 15 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Ultrasonographic Assessment of the Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Patients with Pes PlanusCitations 15 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Ultrasonographic Assessment of the Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Patients with Pes Planus A Multicenter Study by TURK MUSCULUSCitations 15 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Ultrasonographic Assessment of the Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Patients with Pes PlanusCitations 15 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Ultrasonographic Assessment of the Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Patients with Pes PlanusCitations 15 · OpenAlex