İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2025 · article

Additively manufactured resin-based endocrowns: Effect of material type, margin configuration, and pulp chamber depth on fabrication trueness and fit

ISSN0300-5712
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · hybrid Üst %10
Yıl2025
Atıf8OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%97,5
FWCI7,261,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q1

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıJournal of Dentistry
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Journal of Dentistry
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of margin configuration and pulp chamber depth on the fabrication trueness and internal fit of resin-based endocrowns fabricated with additive (AM) and subtractive manufacturing (SM). METHODS: Four mandibular first molar typodonts prepared with butt joint or 1 mm-wide shoulder margins and 2 mm or 4 mm pulp chamber depths were digitized to design reference endocrowns. These designs were used to fabricate endocrowns with AM (Crowntec [AM-CT], FREEPRINT Crown [AM-FP], Tera Harz TC80DP [AM-GR]) or SM (Tetric CAD [SM-TC]) (n = 7). Surface deviations (external, intaglio, and marginal root mean square, RMS) and triple scan protocol (average gap) were used for digital analyses. Data were analyzed with generalized linear models (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Intaglio RMS was affected by the interaction of all main factors, while all surface deviations were affected by material type-margin configuration interaction. Material type-pulp chamber depth interaction affected intaglio RMS and average gaps, whereas margin configuration-pulp chamber depth interaction affected all outcomes, except intaglio RMS (P ≤ 0.001). AM-GR mostly led to lower intaglio and marginal RMS, while SM-TC mostly led to lower external RMS (P ≤ 0.022). SM-TC endocrowns with 4-mm depth had the highest and AM-GR endocrowns with 4-mm depth mostly had lower average gaps (P ≤ 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The interactions among the main factors affected the trueness of the tested endocrowns. However, no clear trend emerged that would highlight any subgroup as having the highest trueness. Most endocrowns demonstrated clinically acceptable internal gaps. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Tested additively manufactured resin-based endocrowns had favorable internal adaptation. However, they may require more chairside adjustments on external surfaces compared to tested subtractively manufactured endocrowns.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

8atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 6 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2025 Fracture strength of additively manufactured one-piece endodontic crowns in resins for definitive use: Effect of material type, margin configuration, and pulp chamber depthAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  2. 2026 Fracture resistance of endocrowns produced by 3D printing and CAD-CAM blocks: a comparative assessmentAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  3. 2026 Comparison of the intaglio surface accuracy of occlusal veneers fabricated using two different techniques to restore severe occlusal tooth wear: An in vitro study.Atıf 1 · OpenAlex
  4. 2026 Comparative evaluation of the internal and marginal adaptation of 1-piece endodontic crowns fabricated by additive, subtractive, and conventional techniques using different assessment methodsAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
  5. 2026 Mechanical and surface properties of resin-based materials for permanent use fabricated by subtractive, additive, and hybrid manufacturing techniquesAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
  6. 2026 Effect of different definitive restoration resins and postpolymerization durations on the trueness of 3D printed one-piece endodontic crownsAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

7
  1. PINAR ALTINCI 1
  2. MUSTAFA BORGA DÖNMEZ İSTANBUL AYDIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. GÜLCE ÇAKMAK 3
  4. HANAN AL-JOHANI 4
  5. ÇİĞDEM KAHVECİ 5
  6. DAMLA ERKAL BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ 6
  7. BURAK YILMAZ ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 7