İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2010 · article

Contribution of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Characterization of Breast Tumors

Dergi American Journal of Roentgenology
OpenAlex Üst %10
Yıl2010
Atıf236OpenAlex
Atıf243Semantic Scholar · 10 etkili
Yüzdelik%97,6
FWCI7,671,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS dergi adıAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of an imaging protocol that combines dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with suspicious breast lesions and to determine if additional information provided by DWI improves the diagnostic value of breast MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with breast tumors (37 benign, 47 malignant) underwent DCE-MRI and DWI before biopsy. Morphologic and kinetic analyses were performed on DCE-MRI and findings were classified according to the BI-RADS lexicon. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated from the DWI. The ADCs of the benign and malignant lesions were compared. For the combined MRI protocol, morphologic kinetic features and ADCs were evaluated together. Diagnostic values of DCE-MRI, DWI, and combined MRI were calculated. RESULTS: Median ADCs of the benign and malignant lesions were 1.26 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s and 0.75 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively. Cutoff value of 0.92 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for ADC provided 91.5% sensitivity and 86.5% specificity. DCE-MRI alone showed 97.9% sensitivity and 75.7% specificity. The combination of DCE-MRI with DWI provided 95.7% sensitivity and 89.2% specificity. The specificity of breast MRI improved by 13.5% (p = 0.063) without a significant decrease in the sensitivity (p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: The combination of DWI and DCE-MRI has the potential to increase the specificity of breast MRI.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

236atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 42 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2013 Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms: a multicenter phantom studyAtıf 56 · OpenAlex
  2. 2013 Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms a multicenter phantom studyAtıf 56 · OpenAlex
  3. 2013 Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms a multicenter phantom studyAtıf 56 · OpenAlex
  4. 2013 Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms a multicenter phantom studyAtıf 56 · OpenAlex
  5. 2017 Diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in breast cancer and correlation with the prognostic factorsAtıf 47 · OpenAlex
  6. 2017 Diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in breast cancer and correlation with the prognostic factorsAtıf 47 · OpenAlex
  7. 2016 Diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in breast cancer and correlation with the prognostic factorsAtıf 47 · OpenAlex
  8. 2015 Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron EmissionTomography/Computed Tomography inBreast Cancer: Correlation of theApparent Diffusion Coefficient andMaximum Standardized Uptake ValuesWith Prognostic FactorsAtıf 45 · OpenAlex
  9. 2014 Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesionsAtıf 40 · OpenAlex
  10. 2013 Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesionsAtıf 40 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

Yazar bilgisi yok.