Makale detayı · 2010 · article
Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and conventional multislice spiral tomography in sheep mandibular condyle fractures
Veri kaynağı ayrımı
- YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
- YÖKSİS dergi adıDentomaxillofacial Radiology
- Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
- OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
- Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)
Özet
OBJECTIVES: the aim of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT in artificially created fractures of the sheep mandibular condyle. METHODS: 63 full-thickness sheep heads were used in this study. Two surgeons created the fractures, which were either displaced or non-displaced. CBCT images were acquired by the NewTom 3G CBCT scanner (NIM, Verona, Italy) and CT imaging was performed using the Toshiba Aquillon multislice CT scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan). Two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional images and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions were evaluated by two observers who were asked to determine the presence or absence of fracture and displacement, the type of fracture, anatomical localization and type of displacement. The naked-eye inspection during surgery served as the gold standard. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated with weighted kappa statistics. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses were used to compare statistically the area under the curve (AUC) of both imaging modalities. RESULTS: kappa coefficients of intra- and interobserver agreement scores varied between 0.56 - 0.98, which were classified as moderate and excellent, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the imaging modalities, which were both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of sheep condylar fractures. CONCLUSIONS: this study confirms that CBCT is similar to CT in the diagnosis of different types of experimentally created sheep condylar fractures and can provide a cost- and dose-effective diagnostic option.
Konular
Atıflar
OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.
35atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)
Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 13 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).
- 2020 Cone-beam computed tomography imaging of dentoalveolar and mandibular fracturesAtıf 21 · OpenAlex
- 2020 Cone‑beam computed tomography imaging of dentoalveolarand mandibular fracturesAtıf 20 · OpenAlex
- 2021 Contemporary Imaging Modalities for Temporomandibular JointAtıf 6 · OpenAlex
- 2021 Contemporary Imaging Modalities for Temporomandibular JointAtıf 6 · OpenAlex
- 2019 Examination of cone-beam computerized tomography requests reasonsAtıf 6 · OpenAlex
- 2019 Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi istek nedenlerinin incelenmesiAtıf 6 · OpenAlex
- 2019 Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi istek nedenlerinin incelenmesiAtıf 6 · OpenAlex
- 2021 Comparison of Panoramic, Lateral Skull Projection and CBCT Images in Detection of Mandibular Condyle FracturesAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
- 2021 Comparison of Panoramic, Lateral Skull Projection and CBCT Images in Detection of Mandibular Condyle FracturesAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
- 2021 Comparison of Panoramic, Lateral Skull Projection and CBCT Images in Detection of Mandibular Condyle FracturesAtıf 1 · OpenAlex