Comparison of Conventional Syringe CanalBrush EndoActivator Photon Induced Photoacoustic Streaming and Manual Instrumentation in Removing Orange Brown Precipitate An In Vitro Study

OpenAlex İngilizce

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the various techniques for removing precipitate formed after irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX). BACKGROUND DATA: It is still unclear whether different irrigant activation systems can effectively remove precipitate that is firmly attached to the root canal walls. METHODS: Eighty-two extracted single-rooted human teeth were instrumented by using the ProTaper rotary system. The roots were irrigated with 5% NaOCl and then 2% CHX to form orange-brown precipitate on the root canal walls. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally, and the amount of precipitate on the canal walls was measured under a stereomicroscope at 15 × magnification before the root halves were reassembled. Then, conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), CanalBrush (CB), EndoActivator (EA) system, photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and manual instrumentation (MI) techniques were used to remove the precipitate, during which 5 mL of distilled water was used for 1 min. The amount of precipitate remaining on the canal walls was measured, and the percentage of precipitate removed was calculated. Data were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p = 0.05). RESULTS: All experimental groups contained residual precipitate. The precipitate was more effectively removed in the MI group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). The CB and EA groups showed better removal than the CSI and PIPS groups (p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences in removal between these latter two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: None of the techniques used was able to completely remove the orange-brown precipitate from the root canal surfaces.