İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2024 · article

C-Shaped Canal Prevalence and Morphology in Maxillary Molar Teeth: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation

Dergi Essentials of Dentistry
ISSN2791-9552
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · diamond TR Index
Yıl2024
Atıf0OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%26,1
FWCI0,01,00 = dünya ortalaması

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıEssentials of Dentistry
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Background: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence and morphology of the C-shaped root canal(s) in maxillary molar teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methods: In 2024, the maxillary CBCT volumes of 475 patients were evaluated for C-shaped canal morphology at 3 different axial levels of the molar roots. Classification of the C-shaped canal was done according to the root fusion type, followed by consecutive axial slices with an upper-C (UC)1 or UC2 configuration. The Z-test for proportions in independent groups was used to analyze the differences between location (left and right sides) and tooth (first or second upper molars). The chi-square test was used to compare root fusion types (P=.05). Results: C-shaped canal morphology was found in 4.89% of 797 maxillary molars. C-shaped canal was encountered in 8% of maxillary second and 2% of maxillary first molars. Six different types of UC configurations were observed, with type-A canal structure (23%) having the highest occurrence (P > .05). UC1 configuration was more common in the second molars at the middle (P=.017) and apical levels (P=.007). Conclusion: Despite the low prevalence, high complexity in morphology requires the attention of clinicians regarding C-shaped maxillary molars to avoid failures and complications. Cite this article as: Ulusoy AC, Aslan E, Baksı BG, Mert A, Şen BH. C-shaped canal prevalence and morphology in maxillary molar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Essent Dent. 2024;3(3):100-105.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

0atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yazarlar

5
  1. ALİ CANBERK ULUSOY 1
  2. ELİF ASLAN 2
  3. BEDRİYE GÜNİZ BAKSI ŞEN EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. ALİ MERT İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4
  5. BİLGE HAKAN ŞEN 5