Makale detayı · 2016 · article
Bronchodilator efficacy of 18 microg once-daily tiotropium inhalation via Discairsupreg/sup versus HandiHalersupreg/sup in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, Phase IV trial
Veri kaynağı ayrımı
- YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
- YÖKSİS dergi adıInternational Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)International Journal of COPD
- OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
- Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)
Özet
Purpose: To compare the bronchodilator efficacy of 18 µg once-daily tiotropium inhalation administered via Discair ® versus HandiHaler ® in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients and methods: Fifty-eight patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were enrolled in this randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, Phase IV non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomly assigned to a test group (n=29, inhalation with Discair) or a reference group (n=29, inhalation with HandiHaler). The primary efficacy parameter was the average maximum change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 , in L). Change in forced vital capacity (FVC, in L), %FEV 1 and %FVC, the standardized area under the response–time curve (AUC) for the absolute change in FEV 1 and FVC, time to onset and peak of response, and safety data were also evaluated. Results: The test inhaler was non-inferior to the reference inhaler in terms of maximum change in FEV 1 at 24 h (unadjusted change: 0.0017 L [95% confidence interval [CI]: –0.0777, 0.0812]; change adjusted for time to reach maximum change in FEV 1 and smoking in pack-years: 0.0116 L [95% CI: –0.0699, 0.0931]), based on a non-inferiority margin of 0.100 L. There were also no significant differences between the two groups in maximum change in FVC value from baseline (0.3417 L vs 0.4438 L, P =0.113), percent change from baseline (22.235 vs 20.783 for FEV 1 , P =0.662; 16.719 vs 20.337 for FVC, P =0.257), and AUC 0–24 h (2.949 vs 2.833 L for FEV 1 , P =0.891; 2.897 vs 4.729 L for FVC, P =0.178). There were no adverse events, serious adverse events, or deaths. Conclusion: Our findings show that the Discair was non-inferior to the HandiHaler. More specifically, these devices had similar clinical efficacy in terms of time-dependent response over 24 h for patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Keywords: non-inferiority, tiotropium, Discair ® , HandiHaler ® , bronchodilator efficacy, spirometry
Konular
Atıflar
OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.
2atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)
Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 4 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).
- 2019 Bronchodilator efficacy of tiotropium/formoterol (18/12 µg once daily via a Discair inhaler), tiotropium alone (18 µg by Handihaler) or combined with formoterol (12 µg twice daily by Aerolizer) in adults with moderate-to-severe stable COPDAtıf 4 · OpenAlex
- 2019 Bronchodilator efficacy of tiotropium/formoterol (18/12 µg once daily via a Discair inhaler), tiotropium alone (18 µg by Handihaler) or combined with formoterol (12 µg twice daily by Aerolizer) in adults with moderate-to-severe stable COPDAtıf 4 · OpenAlex
- 2019 Bronchodilator Efficacy of a Single-Dose 12/400-µg Formoterol/Budesonide Combination as a Dry Powder for Inhalation Delivered by Discair® in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Stable COPD: Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase IV TrialAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
- 2019 Bronchodilator Efficacy of a Single-Dose 12/400-µg Formoterol/Budesonide Combination as a Dry Powder for Inhalation Delivered by Discair® in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Stable COPD: Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase IV Trial.Atıf 0 · OpenAlex